Re: [PATCH] mm, soft-offline: convert parameter to pfn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17.10.19 09:50, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:16:42AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 17.10.19 01:47, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:57:57AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.10.19 10:54, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:34:52AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.10.19 10:27, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 09:56:19AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.10.19 09:09, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
Hi,

I wrote a simple cleanup for parameter of soft_offline_page(),
based on thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/11/57.

I know that we need more cleanup on hwpoison-inject, but I think
that will be mentioned in re-write patchset Oscar is preparing now.
So let me shared only this part as a separate one now.
...

I think you should rebase that patch on linux-next (where the
pfn_to_online_page() check is in place). I assume you'll want to move the
pfn_to_online_page() check into soft_offline_page() then as well?

I rebased to next-20191016. And yes, we will move pfn_to_online_page()
into soft offline code.  It seems that we can also move pfn_valid(),
but is simply moving like below good enough for you?

At least I can't am the patch to current next/master (due to
pfn_to_online_page()).

Could also be that my "git am" skills failed as the mail was not a
proper patch itself :)

Sorry for the inconvenience, my company email system breaks original
message by introducing quoted-printable format ('=20' or '=3D').
Most mail client usually handles it but git-am doesn't.
I give up using it and send via smtp.gmail.com.

@@ -1877,11 +1877,17 @@ static int soft_offline_free_page(struct page *page)
    * This is not a 100% solution for all memory, but tries to be
    * ``good enough'' for the majority of memory.
    */
-int soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
+int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
   {
   	int ret;
-	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
+	struct page *page;
+	if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
+		return -ENXIO;
+	/* Only online pages can be soft-offlined (esp., not ZONE_DEVICE). */
+	page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
+	if (!page)
+		return -EIO;
   	if (is_zone_device_page(page)) {

-> this is now no longer possible! So you can drop the whole if
(is_zone_device....) case

OK, thanks. I updated it.

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
---
  From 5faf227839b578726fe7f5ff414a153abb3b3a31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:40:53 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] mm, soft-offline: convert parameter to pfn

Currently soft_offline_page() receives struct page, and its sibling
memory_failure() receives pfn. This discrepancy looks weird and makes
precheck on pfn validity tricky. So let's align them.

Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/base/memory.c |  7 +------
   include/linux/mm.h    |  2 +-
   mm/madvise.c          |  2 +-
   mm/memory-failure.c   | 19 +++++++++----------
   4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index 55907c27075b..a757d9ed88a7 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -538,12 +538,7 @@ static ssize_t soft_offline_page_store(struct device *dev,
   	if (kstrtoull(buf, 0, &pfn) < 0)
   		return -EINVAL;
   	pfn >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
-	if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
-		return -ENXIO;
-	/* Only online pages can be soft-offlined (esp., not ZONE_DEVICE). */
-	if (!pfn_to_online_page(pfn))
-		return -EIO;
-	ret = soft_offline_page(pfn_to_page(pfn), 0);
+	ret = soft_offline_page(pfn, 0);
   	return ret == 0 ? count : ret;
   }
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 44d058723db9..fd360d208346 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2794,7 +2794,7 @@ extern int sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill;
   extern int sysctl_memory_failure_recovery;
   extern void shake_page(struct page *p, int access);
   extern atomic_long_t num_poisoned_pages __read_mostly;
-extern int soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags);
+extern int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
   /*
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 2be9f3fdb05e..99dd06fecfa9 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
   			pr_info("Soft offlining pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
   					pfn, start);
-			ret = soft_offline_page(page, MF_COUNT_INCREASED);
+			ret = soft_offline_page(pfn, MF_COUNT_INCREASED);
   			if (ret)
   				return ret;
   			continue;
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 05c8c6df25e6..af2712004a4d 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
   		if (!gotten)
   			break;
   		if (entry.flags & MF_SOFT_OFFLINE)
-			soft_offline_page(pfn_to_page(entry.pfn), entry.flags);
+			soft_offline_page(entry.pfn, entry.flags);
   		else
   			memory_failure(entry.pfn, entry.flags);
   	}
@@ -1857,7 +1857,7 @@ static int soft_offline_free_page(struct page *page)
   /**
    * soft_offline_page - Soft offline a page.
- * @page: page to offline
+ * @pfn: pfn to soft-offline
    * @flags: flags. Same as memory_failure().
    *
    * Returns 0 on success, otherwise negated errno.
@@ -1877,18 +1877,17 @@ static int soft_offline_free_page(struct page *page)
    * This is not a 100% solution for all memory, but tries to be
    * ``good enough'' for the majority of memory.
    */
-int soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
+int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
   {
   	int ret;
-	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
+	struct page *page;
-	if (is_zone_device_page(page)) {
-		pr_debug_ratelimited("soft_offline: %#lx page is device page\n",
-				pfn);
-		if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
-			put_page(page);
+	if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
+		return -ENXIO;
+	/* Only online pages can be soft-offlined (esp., not ZONE_DEVICE). */
+	page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
+	if (!page)

If you pass in a PFN with MF_COUNT_INCREASED via mm/madvise.c, you would now
no longer do a put_page(page) in case of ZONE_DEVICE (!page =
pfn_to_online_page(pfn);)

Yes, right.


something like this

page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
if (!page) {
	/*
	 * With MF_COUNT_INCREASED, we can use pfn_to_page() directly
	 * (esp., ZONE_DEVICE).
	 */
	if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
		put_page(pfn_to_page(page));
	return -EIO;
}

For !pfn_valid(pfn), this is not relevant.

Actually I guess that !pfn_valid() never happens when called from
madvise_inject_error(), because madvise_inject_error() gets pfn via
get_user_pages_fast() which only returns valid page for valid pfn.

And we plan to remove MF_COUNT_INCREASED by Oscar's re-design work,
so I start feeling that this patch should come on top of his tree.

I agree, let's clean that up first.

--

Thanks,

David / dhildenb




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux