On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:19:21PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > Ok, I just read the mm patches and made assumptions about what you were trying > to accomplish. I suppose I should probably dig my stuff back out. Thanks, Fair enough. The mm bits are basically providing backoffs when shrinkers can't make progress for whatever reason (e.g. GFP_NOFS context, requires IO, etc) so that other reclaim scanning can be done while we wait for other progress (like cleaning inodes) can be made before trying to reclaim inodes again. The back-offs are required to prevent priority wind-up and OOM if reclaim progress is extremely slow. These patches aggregate them into bound global reclaim delays between page reclaim and slab shrinking rather than lots of unbound individual delays inside specific shrinkers that end up slowing down the entire slab shrinking scan. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
