On 07/10/2019 19:11, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 05:20:30PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: >> On 07/10/2019 17:10, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:38:14PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: >>>> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c >>>> index 902f5fa6bf93..34fe904dd417 100644 >>>> +++ b/mm/hmm.c >>>> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static void hmm_range_need_fault(const struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk, >>>> } >>>> >>>> static int hmm_vma_walk_hole(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >>>> - struct mm_walk *walk) >>>> + __always_unused int depth, struct mm_walk *walk) >>> >>> It this __always_unused on function arguments something we are doing >>> now? >> >> $ git grep __always_unused | wc -l >> 191 >> >> It's elsewhere in the kernel tree. It seems like a good way of both >> documenting and silencing compiler warnings. But I'm open to other >> suggestions. > > The normal kernel build doesn't generate warnings for unused function > parameters because there are alot of false positives, IIRC. So, seems > weird to see things like this. > >>> Can we have negative depth? Should it be unsigned? >> >> As per the documentation added in this patch: >> >> * @pte_hole: if set, called for each hole at all levels, >> * depth is -1 if not known, 0:PGD, 1:P4D, 2:PUD, 3:PMD >> * 4:PTE. Any folded depths (where PTRS_PER_P?D is equal >> * to 1) are skipped. >> >> So it's signed to allow "-1" in the cases where pte_hole is called >> without knowing the actual depth. This is used in the function >> walk_page_test() because it don't walk the actual page tables, but is >> called on a VMA instead. This means that there may not be a single depth >> for the range provided. > > So are the depth values below OK? I would have expected -1 by this > definition Good spot - that indeed was very sloppy of me. In these cases the value is ignored, but -1 would indeed have been a better value to use. I'll fix that up. Thanks, Steve >>>> { >>>> struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk = walk->private; >>>> struct hmm_range *range = hmm_vma_walk->range; >>>> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, >>>> again: >>>> pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp); >>>> if (pmd_none(pmd)) >>>> - return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk); >>>> + return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk); >>>> >>>> if (thp_migration_supported() && is_pmd_migration_entry(pmd)) { >>>> bool fault, write_fault; >>>> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, >>>> again: >>>> pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp); >>>> if (pud_none(pud)) >>>> - return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk); >>>> + return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk); >>>> >>>> if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) { >>>> unsigned long i, npages, pfn; >>>> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, >>>> bool fault, write_fault; >>>> >>>> if (!pud_present(pud)) >>>> - return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk); >>>> + return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk); >>>> >>>> i = (addr - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT; >>>> npages = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >