Re: [PATCH 05/11] IB/hfi1: convert __mmu_int_rb to half closed intervals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Michel Lespinasse wrote:

On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:18:52PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c
index 14d2a90964c3..fb6382b2d44e 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/rculist.h>
 #include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
-#include <linux/interval_tree_generic.h>
+#include <linux/interval_tree_gen.h>

 #include "mmu_rb.h"
 #include "trace.h"
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static unsigned long mmu_node_start(struct mmu_rb_node *node)

 static unsigned long mmu_node_last(struct mmu_rb_node *node)
 {
-	return PAGE_ALIGN(node->addr + node->len) - 1;
+	return PAGE_ALIGN(node->addr + node->len);
 }

May as well rename the function mmu_node_end(). I was worried if it
was used anywhere else, but it turned out it's only used when defining
the interval tree.

Right.

In general I tried not to rename everything to end because I wanted to
avoid bloating the diffstat, albeit having naming discrepancies within
the code (which isn't new either fwiw).


I would also suggest moving this function (as well as mmu_node_first)
right before its use, rather than just after, which would allow you to
also remove the function prototype a few lines earlier.

Indeed, but again I don't want to unnecessarily grow the patch. I have
several notes to come back to once/if this series is settled.


Looks good to me otherwise.

Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Davidlohr




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux