On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 06:15:11AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > My take is that this (Davidlohr's) patch series does not necessarily > need to be applied all at once - we could get the first change in > (adding the interval_tree_gen.h header), and convert the first few > users, without getting them all at once, as long as we have a plan for > finishing the work. So, if you have cleanups in progress in some of > the files, just tell us which ones and we can leave them out from the > first pass. Since we have users which do need to use the full ULONG_MAX range (as pointed out by Christian Koenig), I don't think adding a second implementation which is half-open is a good idea. It'll only lead to confusion.
