On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 09:57 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/4/19 9:37 AM, Miles Chen wrote:
> > In __set_page_owner_handle(), we should loop over page
> > [0...(1 << order) - 1] and setup their page_owner structures.
> >
> > Currently, __set_page_owner_handle() update page_ext at the end of
> > the loop, sets the page_owner of (page + 0) twice and
> > misses the page_owner of (page + (1 << order) - 1).
> >
> > Fix it by updating the page_ext at the start of the loop.
> >
> > In i == 0 case:
> > for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
> > page_owner = get_page_owner(page_ext); <- page_ext belongs to page + 0
> > ...
> > page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page + i); <- lookup_page_ext(page + 0)
> > }
> >
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 7e2f2a0cd17c ("mm, page_owner: record page owner for each subpage")
>
> Thanks. Kirill spotted it earlier and there's a fix pending:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190930122916.14969-2-vbabka@xxxxxxx/
Great. thanks for the information.
Miles
>
> > ---
> > mm/page_owner.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c
> > index dee931184788..110c3e1987f2 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_owner.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_owner.c
> > @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static inline void __set_page_owner_handle(struct page *page,
> > int i;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
> > + page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page + i);
> > page_owner = get_page_owner(page_ext);
> > page_owner->handle = handle;
> > page_owner->order = order;
> > @@ -185,8 +186,6 @@ static inline void __set_page_owner_handle(struct page *page,
> > page_owner->last_migrate_reason = -1;
> > __set_bit(PAGE_EXT_OWNER, &page_ext->flags);
> > __set_bit(PAGE_EXT_OWNER_ACTIVE, &page_ext->flags);
> > -
> > - page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page + i);
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
>
