On Fri 13-05-11 12:36:08, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:53:48AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 12-05-11 16:53:57, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > Since the VM now has means to do global reclaim from the per-memcg lru > > > lists, the global LRU list is no longer required. > > > > Shouldn't this one be at the end of the series? > > I don't really have an opinion. Why do you think it should? It is the last step in my eyes and maybe we want to keep both global LRU as a fallback for some time just to get an impression (with some tracepoints)how well does the per-cgroup reclaim goes. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>