Re: [PATCH] sched: Avoid spurious lock dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Avoid spurious lock dependencies
From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:22:36 -0400
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, thgarnie@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, cl@xxxxxxxxx, penberg@xxxxxxxxxx, rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20191001091837.GK4536@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20191001091837.GK4536@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>


> On Oct 1, 2019, at 5:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Does the below adequately describe the situation?

Yes, looks fine.

References:
- [PATCH] sched: Avoid spurious lock dependencies
  - From: Peter Zijlstra

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/15] mm: Align THP mappings for non-DAX
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/15] mm: Align THP mappings for non-DAX
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Avoid spurious lock dependencies
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Avoid spurious lock dependencies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux