Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi James!

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:34:27PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Yes, but only once in all the testing.  With patches 1 and 2 the hang is

Weird patch 2 makes the large order allocation without ~__GFP_WAIT, so
even COMPACTION=y/n shouldn't matter anymore. Am I misreading
something Mel?

Removing ~__GFP_WAIT from patch 2 (and adding ~__GFP_REPEAT as a
correctness improvement) and setting COMPACTION=y also should work ok.

Removing ~__GFP_WAIT from patch 2 and setting COMPACTION=n is expected
not to work well.

But compaction should only make the difference if you remove
~__GFP_WAIT from patch 2.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]