Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 12 May 2011, James Bottomley wrote:

> > Debian and Ubuntu have been using SLUB for a long time
>
> Only from Squeeze, which has been released for ~3 months.  That doesn't
> qualify as a "long time" in my book.

I am sorry but I have never used a Debian/Ubuntu system in the last 3
years that did not use SLUB. And it was that by default. But then we
usually do not run the "released" Debian version. Typically one runs
testing. Ubuntu is different there we usually run releases. But those
have been SLUB for as long as I remember.

And so far it is rock solid and is widely rolled out throughout our
infrastructure (mostly 2.6.32 kernels).

> but a sample of one doeth not great testing make.
>
> However, since you admit even you see problems, let's concentrate on
> fixing them rather than recriminations?

I do not see problems here with earlier kernels. I only see these on one
testing system with the latest kernels on Ubuntu 11.04.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]