On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:07:14AM +0800, Pengfei Li wrote:
Hi Pengfei!
> The 'type' of the function new_kmalloc_cache should be
> enum kmalloc_cache_type instead of int, so correct it.
I think you mean type of the 'i' variable, not the type of
new_kmalloc_cache() function. Also the name of the patch is
misleading. How about
mm, slab_common: use enum kmalloc_cache_type to iterate over kmalloc caches ?
Or something like this.
The rest of the series looks good to me.
Please, feel free to use
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
for patches [1-3] in the series after fixing this commit message and
restoring __initconst.
Patch [4] needs some additional clarifications, IMO.
Thank you!
>
> Signed-off-by: Pengfei Li <lpf.vector@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/slab_common.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index cae27210e4c3..d64a64660f86 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -1192,7 +1192,7 @@ void __init setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table(void)
> }
>
> static void __init
> -new_kmalloc_cache(int idx, int type, slab_flags_t flags)
> +new_kmalloc_cache(int idx, enum kmalloc_cache_type type, slab_flags_t flags)
> {
> if (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM)
> flags |= SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT;
> @@ -1210,7 +1210,8 @@ new_kmalloc_cache(int idx, int type, slab_flags_t flags)
> */
> void __init create_kmalloc_caches(slab_flags_t flags)
> {
> - int i, type;
> + int i;
> + enum kmalloc_cache_type type;
>
> for (type = KMALLOC_NORMAL; type <= KMALLOC_RECLAIM; type++) {
> for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i <= KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH; i++) {
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>
