On Thu 05-09-19 22:39:47, Tetsuo Handa wrote: [...] > There is nothing that prevents users from enabling oom_dump_tasks by sysctl. > But that requires a solution for OOM stalling problem. You can hardly remove stalling if you are not reducing the amount of output or get it into a different context. Whether the later is reasonable is another question but you are essentially losing "at the OOM event state". > Since I know how > difficult to avoid problems caused by printk() flooding, I insist that > we need "mm,oom: Defer dump_tasks() output." patch. insisting is not a way to cooperate. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
