On 2019/9/4 19:24, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 9/4/19 12:26 PM, zhong jiang wrote: >> With the help of unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci. Unsigned 'nr_pages"' >> compare with zero. And __get_user_pages_locked will return an long value. >> Hence, Convert the long to compare with zero is feasible. > It would be nicer if the parameter nr_pages was long again instead of unsigned > long (note there are two variants of the function, so both should be changed). Yep, the parameter 'nr_pages' was changed to long. and the variants ‘i、step’ should be changed accordingly. >> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Fixes: 932f4a630a69 ("mm/gup: replace get_user_pages_longterm() with FOLL_LONGTERM") > > (which changed long to unsigned long) > > AFAICS... stable shouldn't be needed as the only "risk" is that we goto > check_again even when we fail, which should be harmless. Agreed, Thanks. Sincerely, zhong jiang > Vlastimil > >> --- >> mm/gup.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c >> index 23a9f9c..956d5a1 100644 >> --- a/mm/gup.c >> +++ b/mm/gup.c >> @@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, >> pages, vmas, NULL, >> gup_flags); >> >> - if ((nr_pages > 0) && migrate_allow) { >> + if (((long)nr_pages > 0) && migrate_allow) { >> drain_allow = true; >> goto check_again; >> } >> > > . >