On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 15:28 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 08:10:55AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Currently the page poisoning setting wasn't being enabled unless free page > > hinting was enabled. However we will need the page poisoning tracking logic > > as well for unused page reporting. As such pull it out and make it a > > separate bit of config in the probe function. > > > > In addition we can actually wrap the code in a check for NO_SANITY. If we > > don't care what is actually in the page we can just default to 0 and leave > > it there. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ > > mm/page_reporting.c | 4 ++++ > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c > > index 226fbb995fb0..2c19457ab573 100644 > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c > > @@ -842,7 +842,6 @@ static int virtio_balloon_register_shrinker(struct virtio_balloon *vb) > > static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > { > > struct virtio_balloon *vb; > > - __u32 poison_val; > > int err; > > > > if (!vdev->config->get) { > > @@ -909,11 +908,19 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > VIRTIO_BALLOON_CMD_ID_STOP); > > spin_lock_init(&vb->free_page_list_lock); > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->free_page_list); > > - if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_PAGE_POISON)) { > > - memset(&poison_val, PAGE_POISON, sizeof(poison_val)); > > - virtio_cwrite(vb->vdev, struct virtio_balloon_config, > > - poison_val, &poison_val); > > - } > > + } > > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_PAGE_POISON)) { > > + __u32 poison_val = 0; > > + > > +#if !defined(CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING_NO_SANITY) > > + /* > > + * Let hypervisor know that we are expecting a specific > > + * value to be written back in unused pages. > > + */ > > + memset(&poison_val, PAGE_POISON, sizeof(poison_val)); > > +#endif > > + virtio_cwrite(vb->vdev, struct virtio_balloon_config, > > + poison_val, &poison_val); > > } > > /* > > * We continue to use VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM to decide if a > > I'm a bit confused by this part. Should we not just clear > VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_PAGE_POISON completely? > > In my mind the value written should be what guest puts in > free pages - and possibly what it expects to find there later. I thought it better to err on the side of more information rather than less. With this the host knows that page poisoning is enabled, but that 0 is an acceptable value. > If it doesn't expect anything there then it makes sense > to clear VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_PAGE_POISON so that host does > not try to put the poison value there. That makes sense. > But I think that it does not make sense to lie to host about the poison > value - I think that if we do send poison value to > host it's reasonable for host to expect free pages > have that value - and even possibly to validate that. > > So I think that the hack belongs in virtballoon_validate, > near the page_poisoning_enabled check. Yeah, I will move that for v8. I will just add an IS_ENABLED check to the !page_poisoning_enabled check in virtballoon_validate and can drop the #ifdef check. Thanks. - Alex