On 9/2/19 2:02 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 30-08-19 15:35:06, Khalid Aziz wrote: > [...] >> - Kernel is not self-tuning and is dependent upon a userspace tool to >> perform well in a fundamental area of memory management. > > You keep bringing this up without an actual analysis of a wider range of > workloads that would prove that the default behavior is really > suboptimal. You are making some assumptions based on a very specific DB > workload which might benefit from a more aggressive background workload. > If you really want to sell any changes to auto tuning then you really > need to come up with more workloads and an actual theory why an early > and more aggressive reclaim pays off. > Hi Michal, Fair enough. I have seen DB and cloud server workloads suffer under default behavior of reclaim/compaction. It manifests itself as prolonged delays in populating new database and in launching new cloud applications. It is fair to ask for the predictive algorithm to be proven before pulling something like this in kernel. I will implement this same algorithm in userspace and use existing knobs to tune kernel dynamically. Running that with large number of workloads will provide data on how often does this help. If I find any useful tunables missing, I will be sure to bring it up. Thanks, Khalid
