On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Cleanest would be a new header I guess, together with might_sleep(). > > But moving that is a bit much I think, there's almost 500 callers of > > that one from a quick git grep > > > > > If dropping do while is the only change then I can edit it in.. > > > I think we have the acks now > > > > Yeah sounds simplest, thanks. > > Hi Jason, > > Do you expect me to resend now, or do you plan to do the patchwork > appeasement when applying? I've seen you merged the other patches > (thanks!), but not these two here. Sorry, I didn't get to this before I started travelling, and deferred it since we were having linux-next related problems with hmm.git. I hope to do it today. I will fix it up as promised Thanks, Jason
