On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:29:25PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Fri 31-05-19 12:04:31, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:10:12PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > On Thu 28-02-19 14:53:17, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > Here's what I'm currently looking at. xas_store() becomes a wrapper > > > > around xas_replace() and xas_replace() avoids the xas_init_marks() and > > > > xas_load() calls: > > > > > > This looks reasonable to me. Do you have some official series I could test > > > or where do we stand? > > > > Hi Jan, > > > > Sorry for the delay; I've put this into the xarray tree: > > > > http://git.infradead.org/users/willy/linux-dax.git/shortlog/refs/heads/xarray > > > > I'm planning to ask Linus to pull it in about a week. > > Hum, I still don't see these xarray changes (the change to use > xas_replace() in particular) upstream. What has happened? It had a bug and I decided to pull the patch for now rather than find the bug ... this regression is still on my mind. Thanks for the ping.
