On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:34:13 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:43:12PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > So what is the plan forward? Probably a little late for 5.3, > > > > so queue it up in -mm for 5.4 and deal with the conflicts in at least > > > > hmm? Queue it up in the hmm tree even if it doesn't 100% fit? > > > > > > Did we make a decision on this? Due to travel & LPC I'd like to > > > finalize the hmm tree next week. > > > > I don't think we've made any decision. I'd still love to see this > > in hmm.git. It has a minor conflict, but I can resend a rebased > > version. > > I'm looking at this.. The hmm conflict is easy enough to fix. > > But the compile conflict with these two patches in -mm requires some > action from Andrew: > > commit 027b9b8fd9ee3be6b7440462102ec03a2d593213 > Author: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun Aug 25 11:49:27 2019 +1000 > > mm: introduce MADV_PAGEOUT > > commit f227453a14cadd4727dd159782531d617f257001 > Author: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun Aug 25 11:49:27 2019 +1000 > > mm: introduce MADV_COLD > > Patch series "Introduce MADV_COLD and MADV_PAGEOUT", v7. > > I'm inclined to suggest you send this series in the 2nd half of the > merge window after this MADV stuff lands for least disruption? Just merge it, I'll figure it out. Probably by staging Minchan's patches after linux-next.
