On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 4:06 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > I'm assuming the lockdep one will land, so not going to resend that. > > I was assuming you'd wake the might_lock_nested() along with the i915 > user through the i915/drm tree. If want me to take some or all of that, > lemme know. might_lock_nested() is a different patch series, that one will indeed go in through the drm/i915 tree, thx for the ack there. What I meant here is some mmu notifier lockdep map in this series that Jason said he's going to pick up into hmm.git. I'm doing about 3 or 4 different lockdep annotations series in parallel right now :-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
