On 21.08.19 18:23, Nadav Amit wrote: >> On Aug 21, 2019, at 9:05 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 20.08.19 11:16, Nadav Amit wrote: >>> There is no reason to print warnings when balloon page allocation fails, >>> as they are expected and can be handled gracefully. Since VMware >>> balloon now uses balloon-compaction infrastructure, and suppressed these >>> warnings before, it is also beneficial to suppress these warnings to >>> keep the same behavior that the balloon had before. >> >> I am not sure if that's a good idea. The allocation warnings are usually >> the only trace of "the user/admin did something bad because he/she tried >> to inflate the balloon to an unsafe value". Believe me, I processed a >> couple of such bugreports related to virtio-balloon and the warning were >> very helpful for that. > > Ok, so a message is needed, but does it have to be a generic frightening > warning? > > How about using __GFP_NOWARN, and if allocation do something like: > > pr_warn(“Balloon memory allocation failed”); > > Or even something more informative? This would surely be less intimidating > for common users. > ratelimit would make sense :) And yes, this would certainly be nicer. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
