[PATCH 2/4] mm, notifier: Prime lockdep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We want to teach lockdep that mmu notifiers can be called from direct
reclaim paths, since on many CI systems load might never reach that
level (e.g. when just running fuzzer or small functional tests).

Motivated by a discussion with Jason.

I've put the annotation into mmu_notifier_register since only when we
have mmu notifiers registered is there any point in teaching lockdep
about them. Also, we already have a kmalloc(, GFP_KERNEL), so this is
safe.

Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/mmu_notifier.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index d12e3079e7a4..538d3bb87f9b 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -256,6 +256,13 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 
 	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 0);
 
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) {
+		fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
+		lock_map_acquire(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map);
+		lock_map_release(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map);
+		fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
+	}
+
 	ret = -ENOMEM;
 	mmu_notifier_mm = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmu_notifier_mm), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (unlikely(!mmu_notifier_mm))
-- 
2.23.0.rc1






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux