Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:22 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Aneesh, logic looks correct but there are some cleanups I'd like to
>> see and a lead-in patch that I attached.
>>
>> I've started prefixing nvdimm patches with:
>>
>> libnvdimm/$component:
>>
>> ...since this patch mostly impacts the pmem driver lets prefix it
>> "libnvdimm/pmem: "
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:45 AM Aneesh Kumar K.V
>> <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > This patch add -EOPNOTSUPP as return from probe callback to
>>
>> s/This patch add/Add/
>>
>> No need to say "this patch" it's obviously a patch.
>>
>> > indicate we were not able to initialize a namespace due to pfn superblock
>> > feature/version mismatch. We want to consider this a probe success so that
>> > we can create new namesapce seed and there by avoid marking the failed
>> > namespace as the seed namespace.
>>
>> Please replace usage of "we" with the exact agent involved as which
>> "we" is being referred to gets confusing for the reader.
>>
>> i.e. "indicate that the pmem driver was not..." "The nvdimm core wants
>> to consider this...".
>>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/nvdimm/bus.c | 2 +-
>> > drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c b/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
>> > index 798c5c4aea9c..16c35e6446a7 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
>> > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int nvdimm_bus_probe(struct device *dev)
>> > rc = nd_drv->probe(dev);
>> > debug_nvdimm_unlock(dev);
>> >
>> > - if (rc == 0)
>> > + if (rc == 0 || rc == -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> > nd_region_probe_success(nvdimm_bus, dev);
>>
>> This now makes the nd_region_probe_success() helper obviously misnamed
>> since it now wants to take actions on non-probe success. I attached a
>> lead-in cleanup that you can pull into your series that renames that
>> routine to nd_region_advance_seeds().
>>
>> When you rebase this needs a comment about why EOPNOTSUPP has special handling.
>>
>> > else
>> > nd_region_disable(nvdimm_bus, dev);
>> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
>> > index 4c121dd03dd9..3f498881dd28 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
>> > @@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ static int pmem_attach_disk(struct device *dev,
>> >
>> > static int nd_pmem_probe(struct device *dev)
>> > {
>> > + int ret;
>> > struct nd_namespace_common *ndns;
>> >
>> > ndns = nvdimm_namespace_common_probe(dev);
>> > @@ -505,12 +506,29 @@ static int nd_pmem_probe(struct device *dev)
>> > if (is_nd_pfn(dev))
>> > return pmem_attach_disk(dev, ndns);
>> >
>> > - /* if we find a valid info-block we'll come back as that personality */
>> > - if (nd_btt_probe(dev, ndns) == 0 || nd_pfn_probe(dev, ndns) == 0
>> > - || nd_dax_probe(dev, ndns) == 0)
>>
>> Similar need for an updated comment here to explain the special
>> translation of error codes.
>>
>> > + ret = nd_btt_probe(dev, ndns);
>> > + if (ret == 0)
>> > return -ENXIO;
>> > + else if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
>>
>> Are there cases where the btt driver needs to return EOPNOTSUPP? I'd
>> otherwise like to keep this special casing constrained to the pfn /
>> dax info block cases.
>
> In fact I think EOPNOTSUPP is only something that the device-dax case
> would be concerned with because that's the only interface that
> attempts to guarantee a given mapping granularity.
We need to do similar error handling w.r.t fsdax when the pfn superblock
indicates different PAGE_SIZE and struct page size? I don't think btt
needs to support EOPNOTSUPP. But we can keep it for consistency?
-aneesh
