On 14.08.19 20:32, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 14-08-19 18:09:16, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 14.08.19 17:41, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Commit a9cd410a3d29 ("mm/page_alloc.c: memory hotplug: free pages as higher
>>> order") assumed that any PFN we get via memory resources is aligned to
>>> to MAX_ORDER - 1, I am not convinced that is always true. Let's play safe,
>>> check the alignment and fallback to single pages.
>>>
>>> Cc: Arun KS <arunks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> index 63b1775f7cf8..f245fb50ba7f 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> @@ -646,6 +646,9 @@ static int online_pages_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>>> */
>>> for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += 1ul << order) {
>>> order = min(MAX_ORDER - 1, get_order(PFN_PHYS(end_pfn - pfn)));
>>> + /* __free_pages_core() wants pfns to be aligned to the order */
>>> + if (unlikely(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn, 1ul << order)))
>>> + order = 0;
>>> (*online_page_callback)(pfn_to_page(pfn), order);
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>> @Michal, if you insist, we can drop this patch. "break first and fix
>> later" is not part of my DNA :)
>
> I do not insist but have already expressed that I am not a fan of this
> change. Also I think that "break first" is quite an over statement here.
>
Well this version is certainly nicer than the previous one. I'll let
Andrew decide if he wants to pick it up or drop it from this series.
Thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
