On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 05:39:23PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 11:46 AM Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) > <urezki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS_MAX defines its own callback to update the > > augmented subtree information after a node is modified. It makes > > sense to use it instead of our own propagate implementation. > > > > Apart of that, in case of using generated callback we can eliminate > > compute_subtree_max_size() function and get rid of duplication. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Love it. Thanks a lot for the cleanup! Thank you for review! -- Vlad Rezki
