On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:01:18PM +0000, Song Liu wrote: > + if (pte_none(*pte) || !pte_present(*pte)) > + continue; You don't need to check both. Present is never none. -- Kirill A. Shutemov
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:01:18PM +0000, Song Liu wrote: > + if (pte_none(*pte) || !pte_present(*pte)) > + continue; You don't need to check both. Present is never none. -- Kirill A. Shutemov