On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:52:58PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > It is a bit jarring to have something called devm_* that doesn't > actually do the devm_ part on some paths. > > Maybe this function should be called __request_free_mem_region() with > another name wrapper macro? Seems like a little more churn than required, but I could do it.