Re: [PATCH 6/6] writeback: refill b_io iff empty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 04-05-11 15:39:31, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> To help understand the behavior change, I wrote the writeback_queue_io
> trace event, and found very different patterns between
> - vanilla kernel
> - this patchset plus the sync livelock fixes
> 
> Basically the vanilla kernel each time pulls a random number of inodes
> from b_dirty, while the patched kernel tends to pull a fixed number of
> inodes (enqueue=1031) from b_dirty. The new behavior is very interesting...
  This regularity is really strange. Did you have a chance to look more into
it? I find it highly unlikely that there would be exactly 1031 dirty inodes
in b_dirty list every time you call move_expired_inodes()...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]