On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think we want the mm/memory.c part of this proposal without the
> mm/mlock.c part.
.. but what about mlock not setting the FOLL_MLOCK bit, then?
In that case, you'd get the "mlock extends the stack" problem.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>