Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmscan: shrink slab in node reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:23:29PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 3:35 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Considering that this is a long term behavior of a rarely used node
> > reclaim I would rather not touch it unless some _real_ workload suffers
> > from this behavior. Or is there any reason to fix this even though there
> > is no evidence of real workloads suffering from the current behavior?
> > --
> 
> When we do performance tuning on some workloads(especially if this
> workload is NUMA sensitive), sometimes we may enable it on our test
> environment and then do some benchmark to  dicide whether or not
> applying it on the production envrioment. Although the result is not
> good enough as expected, it is really a performance tuning knob.

So am I understanding correctly that you sometimes enable node reclaim in
production workloads when you find the numbers justify it?  If so, which ones?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux