On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 07:04:32PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:03:37PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > No behavior change. This will add debug visibility to the code, for > > example, to dump the wbc contents when kprobing queue_io(). > > I don't think it's a good idea. The writeback_control should move > back to just controlling per-inode writeback and not be passed to > more routines dealing with high-level writeback. Good point. I can do without this patch. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>