Re: [PATCH RFC] mm/memcontrol: reclaim severe usage over high limit in get_user_pages loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/6/19 10:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 02-08-19 13:44:38, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index ba9138a4a1de..53a35c526e43 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2429,8 +2429,12 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
   				schedule_work(&memcg->high_work);
   				break;
   			}
-			current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += batch;
-			set_notify_resume(current);
+			if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask)) {
+				reclaim_high(memcg, nr_pages, GFP_KERNEL);

ups, this should be s@GFP_KERNEL@gfp_mask@

+			} else {
+				current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += batch;
+				set_notify_resume(current);
+			}
   			break;
   		}
   	} while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));


Should I send an official patch for this?


I prefer to keep it as is while we have no better solution.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux