Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: Do not define PFN_SECTION_SHIFT if !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 23:22 +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Do not define PFN_SECTION_SHIFT if !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <dkiper@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 

I'd like if this was a bit easier to verify that it didn't break
anything.  Basically, we should probably limit direct use of
PFN_SECTION_SHIFT to inside #ifdefs in headers.

But, if something is truly using this today, it's probably broken.  It's
easy enough to work around if someone hits it, I guess.

Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]