On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 17:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > The 'sad' part is that x86 already switches to init_mm on idle and we > only keep the active_mm around for 'stupid'. Wait, where do we do that? > Rik and Andy were working on getting that 'fixed' a while ago, not > sure > where that went. My lazy TLB stuff got merged last year. Did we miss a spot somewhere, where the code still quietly switches to init_mm for no good reason? -- All Rights Reversed.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
