On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 09:45:23AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 29-07-19 16:10:37, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > In our testing(carmera recording), Miguel and Wei found unmap_page_range
> > takes above 6ms with preemption disabled easily. When I see that, the
> > reason is it holds page table spinlock during entire 512 page operation
> > in a PMD. 6.2ms is never trivial for user experince if RT task couldn't
> > run in the time because it could make frame drop or glitch audio problem.
>
> Where is the time spent during the tear down? 512 pages doesn't sound
> like a lot to tear down. Is it the TLB flushing?
Miguel confirmed there is no such big latency without mark_page_accessed
in zap_pte_range so I guess it's the contention of LRU lock as well as
heavy activate_page overhead which is not trivial, either.
>
> > This patch adds preemption point like coyp_pte_range.
> >
> > Reported-by: Miguel de Dios <migueldedios@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Wei Wang <wvw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/memory.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > index 2e796372927fd..bc3e0c5e4f89b 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > @@ -1007,6 +1007,7 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> > struct zap_details *details)
> > {
> > struct mm_struct *mm = tlb->mm;
> > + int progress = 0;
> > int force_flush = 0;
> > int rss[NR_MM_COUNTERS];
> > spinlock_t *ptl;
> > @@ -1022,7 +1023,16 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> > flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
> > arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> > do {
> > - pte_t ptent = *pte;
> > + pte_t ptent;
> > +
> > + if (progress >= 32) {
> > + progress = 0;
> > + if (need_resched())
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + progress += 8;
>
> Why 8?
Just copied from copy_pte_range.
