Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] uprobe: use FOLL_SPLIT_PMD instead of FOLL_SPLIT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] uprobe: use FOLL_SPLIT_PMD instead of FOLL_SPLIT
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:02:39 -0700
Cc: <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, <matthew.wilcox@xxxxxxxxxx>, <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>, <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <kernel-team@xxxxxx>, <william.kucharski@xxxxxxxxxx>, <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20190726054654.1623433-5-songliubraving@fb.com>
References: <20190726054654.1623433-1-songliubraving@fb.com> <20190726054654.1623433-5-songliubraving@fb.com>

On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 22:46:54 -0700 Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx> wrote:

> This patches uses newly added FOLL_SPLIT_PMD in uprobe. This enables easy
> regroup of huge pmd after the uprobe is disabled (in next patch).

Confused.  There is no "next patch".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] uprobe: use FOLL_SPLIT_PMD instead of FOLL_SPLIT
  - From: Song Liu

References:
- [PATCH v9 0/4] THP aware uprobe
  - From: Song Liu
- [PATCH v9 4/4] uprobe: use FOLL_SPLIT_PMD instead of FOLL_SPLIT
  - From: Song Liu

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm/z3fold.c: Fix z3fold_destroy_pool() ordering
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm/z3fold.c: Fix z3fold_destroy_pool() race condition
Previous by thread: [PATCH v9 4/4] uprobe: use FOLL_SPLIT_PMD instead of FOLL_SPLIT
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] uprobe: use FOLL_SPLIT_PMD instead of FOLL_SPLIT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux