Re: [PATCH 2/3] make new alloc_pages_exact()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 16:42 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> >> Is there an easy way to verify that alloc_pages_exact(5MB) really does allocate
> >> > only 5MB and not 8MB?
> 
> > I'm not sure why you're asking.  How do we know that the _normal_
> > allocator only gives us 4k when we ask for 4k?  Well, that's just how it
> > works.  If alloc_pages_exact() returns success, you know it's got the
> > amount of memory that you asked for, and only that plus a bit of masking
> > for page alignment.
> > 
> > Have you seen alloc_pages_exact() behaving in some other way?
> 
> I've never tested this part of alloc_pages_exact(), even when I wrote (the first
> version of) it.  I just took it on faith that it actually did what it was
> supposed to do.

I did actually go add a bunch of printks to it at one point.  It did
seem to be working just fine and freeing the right amount of memory.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]