Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: document kmemleak's non-blockable __GFP_NOFAIL case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 7/15/19 6:06 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 08:47:07PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:

On 7/13/19 2:25 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 04:49:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
When running ltp's oom test with kmemleak enabled, the below warning was
triggerred since kernel detects __GFP_NOFAIL & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is
passed in:
There are lots of places where kmemleak will call kmalloc with
__GFP_NOFAIL and ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM (including the XArray code, which
is how I know about it).  It needs to be fixed to allow its internal
allocations to fail and return failure of the original allocation as
a consequence.
Do you mean kmemleak internal allocation? It would fail even though
__GFP_NOFAIL is passed in if GFP_NOWAIT is specified. Currently buddy
allocator will not retry if the allocation is non-blockable.
Actually it sets off a warning.  Which is the right response from the
core mm code because specifying __GFP_NOFAIL and __GFP_NOWAIT makes no
sense.

Yes, this is what I meant. Kmemleak did a trick to fool fault-injection by passing in __GFP_NOFAIL, but it doesn't make sense for non-blockable allocation.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux