On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 23:09 +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:51:31AM +0200, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
> >
> > Do not mark regions that are marked with nomap to be present, otherwise
> > these memblock cause unnecessarily allocation of metadata.
> >
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/sparse.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> > index fd13166..33810b6 100644
> > --- a/mm/sparse.c
> > +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> > @@ -256,6 +256,10 @@ void __init memblocks_present(void)
> > struct memblock_region *reg;
> >
> > for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
> > +
> > + if (memblock_is_nomap(reg))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > memory_present(memblock_get_region_node(reg),
> > memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
> > memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
>
>
> The logic looks good, while I am not sure this would take effect. Since the
> metadata is SECTION size aligned while memblock is not.
>
> If I am correct, on arm64, we mark nomap memblock in map_mem()
>
> memblock_mark_nomap(kernel_start, kernel_end - kernel_start);
The nomap is also done by EFI code in ${src}/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
.. and hopefully in the future by this:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/12/126
So it is not really striclty associated with the map_mem().
So it is extremely dependent on the platform how much memory will end up mapped
as nomap.
>
> And kernel text area is less than 40M, if I am right. This means
> memblocks_present would still mark the section present.
>
> Would you mind showing how much memory range it is marked nomap?
We actually have some downstream patches that are using this nomap flag for
more than the use-cases I described above which would enflate the nomap regions
a bit :)
>
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
>
Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Ralf Herbrich
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879
