Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: Handle MADV_WILLNEED through vfs_fadvise()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2, v5.1.17, v4.19.58, v4.14.133, v4.9.185, v4.4.185.

v5.2: Build OK!
v5.1.17: Build OK!
v4.19.58: Build OK!
v4.14.133: Build failed! Errors:
    mm/madvise.c:314:2: error: implicit declaration of function â??vfs_fadviseâ??; did you mean â??sys_madviseâ??? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

v4.9.185: Build failed! Errors:
    mm/madvise.c:266:2: error: implicit declaration of function â??vfs_fadviseâ??; did you mean â??sys_madviseâ??? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

v4.4.185: Build failed! Errors:
    mm/madvise.c:261:2: error: implicit declaration of function â??vfs_fadviseâ??; did you mean â??sys_madviseâ??? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

--
Thanks,
Sasha




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux