Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: support memory.{min, low} protection in cgroup v1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 05-07-19 17:41:44, Yafang Shao wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 5:09 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > Why cannot you move over to v2 and have to stick with v1?
> Because the interfaces between cgroup v1 and cgroup v2 are changed too
> much, which is unacceptable by our customer.

Could you be more specific about obstacles with respect to interfaces
please?

> It may take long time to use cgroup v2 in production envrioment, per
> my understanding.
> BTW, the filesystem on our servers is XFS, but the cgroup  v2
> writeback throttle is not supported on XFS by now, that is beyond my
> comprehension.

Are you sure? I would be surprised if v1 throttling would work while v2
wouldn't. As far as I remember it is v2 writeback throttling which
actually works. The only throttling we have for v1 is reclaim based one
which is a huge hammer.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux