On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:35:33AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Robin, Andrew: As a heads-up, Robin is currently on holiday, so this is all down to Andrew's preference. > I have a series for the hmm tree, which touches the section size > bits, and remove device public memory support. > > It might be best if we include this series in the hmm tree as well > to avoid conflicts. Is it ok to include the rebase version of at least > the cleanup part (which looks like it is not required for the actual > arm64 support) in the hmm tree to avoid conflicts? Per the cover letter, the arm64 patch has a build dependency on the others, so that might require a stable brnach for the common prefix. Thanks, Mark.
