Hello Nicholas, On 06/23/2019 03:14 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > This is a change broken out from the huge vmap vmalloc series as > requested. There is a little bit of dependency juggling across Thanks for splitting up the previous series and sending this one out. > trees, but patches are pretty trivial. Ideally if Andrew accepts > this patch and queues it up for next, then the arch patches would > be merged through those trees then patch 3 gets sent by Andrew. Fair enough. > > I've tested this with other powerpc and vmalloc patches, with code > that explicitly tests vmalloc_to_page on vmalloced memory and > results look fine. - Anshuman
