Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] mm: security: introduce init_on_alloc=1 and init_on_free=1 boot options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 11:12 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri 21-06-19 10:57:35, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 9:09 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > > > index fd5c95ff9251..2f75dd0d0d81 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > > > @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static struct page *kimage_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > > >               arch_kexec_post_alloc_pages(page_address(pages), count,
> > > >                                           gfp_mask);
> > > >
> > > > -             if (gfp_mask & __GFP_ZERO)
> > > > +             if (want_init_on_alloc(gfp_mask))
> > > >                       for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> > > >                               clear_highpage(pages + i);
> > > >       }
> > >
> > > I am not really sure I follow here. Why do we want to handle
> > > want_init_on_alloc here? The allocated memory comes from the page
> > > allocator and so it will get zeroed there. arch_kexec_post_alloc_pages
> > > might touch the content there but is there any actual risk of any kind
> > > of leak?
> > You're right, we don't want to initialize this memory if init_on_alloc is on.
> > We need something along the lines of:
> >   if (!static_branch_unlikely(&init_on_alloc))
> >     if (gfp_mask & __GFP_ZERO)
> >       // clear the pages
> >
> > Another option would be to disable initialization in alloc_pages() using a flag.
>
> Or we can simply not care and keen the code the way it is. First of all
> it seems that nobody actually does use __GFP_ZERO unless I have missed
> soemthing
>         - kimage_alloc_pages(KEXEC_CONTROL_MEMORY_GFP, order); # GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY
>         - kimage_alloc_pages(gfp_mask, 0);
>                 - kimage_alloc_page(image, GFP_KERNEL, KIMAGE_NO_DEST);
>                 - kimage_alloc_page(image, GFP_HIGHUSER, maddr);
>
> but even if we actually had a user do we care about double intialization
> for something kexec related? It is not any hot path AFAIR.
Yes, sounds good. Spraying the code with too many checks for
init_on_alloc doesn't really look nice.

> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs



-- 
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux