On 19.06.19 11:08, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 19-06-19 11:03:49, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 19.06.19 11:01, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] >>> And if they do need a smaller granularity to describe their >>> memory topology then we need a different user API rather the fiddle with >>> implementation details I would argue. >>> >> >> It is not about supporting it, it is about properly blocking it. > > We already do that in test_pages_in_a_zone, right? Albeit in > MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES granularity. > Indeed, thanks for pointing that out. I knew that we were checking zones but had in my head that it was working on zone idx. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
