Please resend this with [2/2] to linux-mm. On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When memory pressure is high, virtio ballooning will probably cause oom killing. > Even if alloc_page with GFP_NORETRY itself does not directly trigger oom it > will make memory becoming low then memory alloc of other processes will trigger > oom killing. It is not desired behaviour. I can't understand why it is undesirable. Why do we have to handle it specially? > > Here disable oom killer in fill_balloon to address this issue. > Add code comment as KOSAKI Motohiro's suggestion. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Âdrivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c |  Â8 ++++++++ > Â1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c   Â2011-04-26 11:39:14.053118406 +0800 > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c  2011-04-26 16:54:56.419741542 +0800 > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > Â#include <linux/freezer.h> > Â#include <linux/delay.h> > Â#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/oom.h> > > Âstruct virtio_balloon > Â{ > @@ -102,6 +103,12 @@ static void fill_balloon(struct virtio_b >    Â/* We can only do one array worth at a time. */ >    Ânum = min(num, ARRAY_SIZE(vb->pfns)); > > +    /* Disable oom killer for indirect oom due to our memory consuming > +    Â* Currently only hibernation code use oom_killer_disable, Hmm, Please look at current mmotm. Now oom_killer_disabled is used by do_try_to_free_pages in mmotm so it could make unnecessary oom kill. BTW, I can't understand why we need to handle virtio by special. Could you explain it in detail? :) -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href