Re: [PATCH v2 hmm 10/11] mm/hmm: Do not use list*_rcu() for hmm->ranges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 6/6/19 11:44 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

This list is always read and written while holding hmm->lock so there is
no need for the confusing _rcu annotations.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
  mm/hmm.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index c2fecb3ecb11e1..709d138dd49027 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
  	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
range->hmm = hmm;
-	list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
+	list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
/*
  	 * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for
@@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
  		return;
mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
-	list_del_rcu(&range->list);
+	list_del(&range->list);
  	mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
/* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux