Re: [PATCH 01/16] uaccess: add untagged_addr definition for other arches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:27 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 09:16:08AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> > Could you reword above sentence? We are already starting off with
> > untagged_addr() not being no-op for arm64 and sparc64. It will expand
> > further potentially. So something more along the lines of "Define it as
> > noop for architectures that do not support memory tagging". The first
> > paragraph in the log can also be rewritten to be not specific to arm64.
>
> Well, as of this patch this actually is a no-op for everyone.
>
> Linus, what do you think of applying this patch (maybe with a slightly
> fixed up commit log) to 5.2-rc so that we remove a cross dependency
> between the series?

(I have adjusted the patch description and have just sent it out
separately from the series).




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux