On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:27 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 09:16:08AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote: > > Could you reword above sentence? We are already starting off with > > untagged_addr() not being no-op for arm64 and sparc64. It will expand > > further potentially. So something more along the lines of "Define it as > > noop for architectures that do not support memory tagging". The first > > paragraph in the log can also be rewritten to be not specific to arm64. > > Well, as of this patch this actually is a no-op for everyone. > > Linus, what do you think of applying this patch (maybe with a slightly > fixed up commit log) to 5.2-rc so that we remove a cross dependency > between the series? (I have adjusted the patch description and have just sent it out separately from the series).
