Re: [BUG BISECT] bug mm/vmalloc.c:470 (mm/vmalloc.c: get rid of one single unlink_va() when merge)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 17:11, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:35:22 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 16:32, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:10:40 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Indeed it looks like effect of merge conflict resolution or applying.
> > > > When I look at MMOTS, it is the same as yours:
> > > > http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit.cgi/linux-mmots.git/commit/?id=b77b8cce67f246109f9d87417a32cd38f0398f2f
> > > >
> > > > However in linux-next it is different.
> > > >
> > > > Stephen, any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Have you had a look at today's linux-next?  It looks correct in
> > > there.  Andrew updated his patch series over the weekend.
> >
> > Yes, I am looking at today's next. Both the source code and the commit
> > 728e0fbf263e3ed359c10cb13623390564102881 have wrong "if (merged)" (put
> > in wrong hunk).
>
> OK, I have replaced that commit with this:

Thank you!

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux