On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 09:14:17AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 12:50 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Pass in the already calculated end value instead of recomputing it, and > > leave the end > start check in the callers instead of duplicating them > > in the arch code. > > Good cleanup, except it's wrong. > > > - if (nr_pages <= 0) > > + if (end < start) > > return 0; > > You moved the overflow test to generic code - good. > > You removed the sign and zero test on nr_pages - bad. I only removed a duplicate of it. The full (old) code in get_user_pages_fast() looks like this: if (nr_pages <= 0) return 0; if (unlikely(!access_ok((void __user *)start, len))) return -EFAULT; if (gup_fast_permitted(start, nr_pages)) {