On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Bruno Prémont
<bonbons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I hope tiny-rcu is not that broken... as it would mean driving any
> PREEMPT_NONE or PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY system out of memory when compiling
> packages (and probably also just unpacking larger tarballs or running
> things like du).
I'm sure that TINYRCU can be fixed if it really is the problem.
So I just want to make sure that we know what the root cause of your
problem is. It's quite possible that it _is_ a real leak of filp or
something, but before possibly wasting time trying to figure that out,
let's see if your config is to blame.
> And with system doing nothing (except monitoring itself) memory usage
> goes increasing all the time until it starves (well it seems to keep
> ~20M free, pushing processes it can to swap). Config is just being
> make oldconfig from working 2.6.38 kernel (answering default for new
> options)
How sure are you that the system really is idle? Quite frankly, the
constant growing doesn't really look idle to me.
> Attached graph matching numbers of previous mail. (dropping caches was at
> 17:55, system idle since then)
Nothing at all going on in 'ps' during that time? And what does
slabinfo say at that point now that kmemleak isn't dominating
everything else?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href